Discrimination vs Equality
We can learn a lot from the civil rights movement. Any group of people who have money, power, or privileges withheld from them are being discriminated against. During the civil rights movement, many people tried to state that separate was the same as equal. No, its not.
I hear women say all the time that they are just fine with not holding the priesthood and they don't have to have it to be considered equal with men. That may be so, but just because they are not give the title of having priesthood authority, does not mean they are equal in all other ways.
Let's take money. Do the women in the church receive the same and equal access to money that the men do? Any budget I ever saw and worked with in the young women's organization never even came close to the young men's budget. The boys scout's budget also superseded that of the teenage girl's. The teen boys were also allowed to solicit for money. If the teen girls were allowed to solicit, their abilities in this area were severely restricted. I was in many wards were they asked for money for the boys scouts directly over the pulpit, called each member of the ward for money (regardless of whether you had a son in the program or not) and they held several fun raisers throughout the year. The girls were allowed only one fundraiser for girls camp--that was all.
Let's take power. The church tells people and especially the women that they are in charge of their own organizations (Relief Society, Young Women's and Primary for the children). The church calls these organizations- 'auxiliaries'. By the churches own definition of an auxiliary, 'is not essential and not truly independent of male oversight, it only spells out that women are not to be trusted with any real authority themselves.' http://facsimilogos.blogspot.com/2011/12/10-reasons-to-leave-lds-church.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auxiliary_organization_(LDS_Church)
Women must have a man present at their activities, must report their activities to male leadership, must have male approval for their activities and must get approval for any funding for them. There is no such thing as female power. Women who speak in general conference, primarily speak to the children, female youth, are given short speaking assignments, and rarely are given time on Sundays-- the highest watched times.
Let's take privileges. Many years ago, I worked in the young women's program. We were trying to motivate the teen girls to read the book of mormon. We came up with the idea to take all the girls who read it in a certain time period on a trip to Salt Lake to visit church history sites. The girls were to have fund raisers to raise all the money by themselves, thus not being a financial burden on their families or the church. We were denied our request by the bishop. We appealed to the stake president. We were denied again. That same summer, the teen boys took a trip to Lagoon for fun and enjoyment. Although they said it was for boys scouts, no merit badges were earned. All the money for the trip came out of the ward budget.
Boys are allowed to go water skiing, camping, skiing, hiking,swimming, site seeing in other states, etc. All these privileges are denied the girls. All these privileges are put under the umbrella of boy scouts, yet few merit badges are earned on all these privileges and equal access for something similar is not granted to the teen girls.
Girls are required to learn to sew, learn how to cook, be a good mom and stay a virgin until married.
Does this meet the level of discrimination? Good thing the church isn't the government; they'd likely be sued. Why do women tolerate such discrimination? Because they are told they are special.
Showing posts with label misogynist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misogynist. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Not Good for Women ~ Part IV
Labels:
civil rights,
discrimination,
equal access,
misogynist,
money,
privileges,
rights
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Not Good for Females
I have repeatedly said that one of the main reasons I left the morg is because it is not a good place for women.
I have given my personal story of how I have been harmed by misogynistic leadership. I have heard so many women who have shared similar storied to mine. The pat answer I get back is that *the church is perfect, the leadership is not*. This is so completely lame, it doesn't deem a response. However, since I hear it so often, I will respond.
If the church were indeed receiving guidance from god, then it would not be making poor choices, repeatedly, that harm a large group of people over a long period of time.
If the church were indeed receiving guidance from god, then its leadership would be making choices that were god-like, not human-like.
If the church were indeed receiving guidance from god, then its choices would reflect equality, love and acceptance, not judgement, condemnation and subjugation.
People would not be leaving in droves due to pain and disillusion.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52448399-78/moon-church-abuse-report.html.csp
I have given my personal story of how I have been harmed by misogynistic leadership. I have heard so many women who have shared similar storied to mine. The pat answer I get back is that *the church is perfect, the leadership is not*. This is so completely lame, it doesn't deem a response. However, since I hear it so often, I will respond.
If the church were indeed receiving guidance from god, then it would not be making poor choices, repeatedly, that harm a large group of people over a long period of time.
If the church were indeed receiving guidance from god, then its leadership would be making choices that were god-like, not human-like.
If the church were indeed receiving guidance from god, then its choices would reflect equality, love and acceptance, not judgement, condemnation and subjugation.
People would not be leaving in droves due to pain and disillusion.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52448399-78/moon-church-abuse-report.html.csp
Labels:
abuse,
acceptance,
blame the victim,
conditional love,
conflict,
discrimination,
eqality,
equal access,
family,
gender roles,
joy,
love,
misogynist,
opinion,
peace,
unhappiness
Saturday, August 20, 2011
The trouble with Polygamy
As Warren Jeffs is in the news of late, I can't help but wonder the uncomfortable feelings that are being felt by so many of my former friends who are mormon. I remember so many discussions we had, that often got heated and ended in arguments and hurt feelings as polygamy is still a difficult topic for most mormon people, especially the women.
As it ought to be. Although the church has banned the practice, it is still written as doctrine in their approved scripture in
D&C 321: 1 Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you my servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of my hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord, justified my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also Moses, David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the principle and doctrine of their having many awivesand bconcubines—3 Therefore, aprepare thy heart to receive and bobey the instructions which I am about to give unto you; for all those who have this law revealed unto them must obey the same. 4 For behold, I reveal unto you a new and an everlastingacovenant; and if ye abide not that covenant, then are ye bdamned; for no one can creject this covenant and be permitted to enter into my glory.
As it ought to be. Although the church has banned the practice, it is still written as doctrine in their approved scripture in
D&C 321: 1 Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you my servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of my hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord, justified my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also Moses, David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the principle and doctrine of their having many awivesand bconcubines—3 Therefore, aprepare thy heart to receive and bobey the instructions which I am about to give unto you; for all those who have this law revealed unto them must obey the same. 4 For behold, I reveal unto you a new and an everlastingacovenant; and if ye abide not that covenant, then are ye bdamned; for no one can creject this covenant and be permitted to enter into my glory.
Even though the church claims to believe in marriage only between one man and one woman, it is written into their doctrine that no one can enter their version of the highest heaven, the celestial kingdom, unless they practice plural marriage.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52371806-78/smith-says-women-wives.html.csp?page=1
This article in the Salt Lake Tribune does an excellent job comparing Joseph Smith to Warren Jeffs. I hope my mormon family and friends will have an open mind enough to read it.
As I have left the church, I am of course, no longer conflicted about polygamy, since I do not believe I will be forced to practice it. We were always told we would accept it. But how could we, when our kind, loving hearts rejected the thoughts of our husbands having sex with multiple women now? Leaving us and being emotionally tied to many other women? Physically and emotionally abandoning us to be with others? If we can't accept it here and now, it isn't going to be possible to accept it in another realm. This is reality, cognitive dissonance.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52412444-78/polygamy-mormon-hudson-lds.html.csp?page=1
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52412444-78/polygamy-mormon-hudson-lds.html.csp?page=1
Labels:
abuse,
blame the victim,
church history,
cognitive dissonance,
conflict,
conformity,
equality,
gender roles,
misogynist,
polyandry,
polygamy,
roles,
women,
worth
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
If I Were God
If I were God
If I were God would I...
Make one man suffer for all the wrongs and sins of others?
Create humans in my image then call them unnatural and an enemy to myself?
Create humans in a fallen state when I call them the pinnacle of my creations?
Give them emotions and then say half those emotions are evil?
Give them reason and logic and then tell them to blindly obey?
Kill my creations through floods, earthquakes and tsunami's?
Create disease, birth defects and life long pain and suffering?
Give commandments to only a portion of my people that
are a requirement to return to my presence
thus damming the rest of my creations
to hell for simply being born to the
wrong parents and wrong
country and wrong
century?
If I were God would I...
Make one man suffer for all the wrongs and sins of others?
Create humans in my image then call them unnatural and an enemy to myself?
Create humans in a fallen state when I call them the pinnacle of my creations?
Give them emotions and then say half those emotions are evil?
Give them reason and logic and then tell them to blindly obey?
Kill my creations through floods, earthquakes and tsunami's?
Create disease, birth defects and life long pain and suffering?
Give commandments to only a portion of my people that
are a requirement to return to my presence
thus damming the rest of my creations
to hell for simply being born to the
wrong parents and wrong
country and wrong
century?
Labels:
accept reality,
anger,
blame the victim,
blaming,
cognitive dissonance,
conditional love,
conflict,
contrast,
control,
delusion,
emotions,
identity,
integrity,
misogynist,
morality,
omnipotence,
poem,
rules,
sacrifice
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
